NoSQL vs SQL Debate
Comments debate the merits, drawbacks, and ongoing relevance of NoSQL databases compared to traditional SQL/relational databases, with many arguing that SQL options like Postgres suffice for most use cases.
Activity Over Time
Top Contributors
Keywords
Sample Comments
I thought NoSQL was a selling point these days?
Is the whole "NoSQL is better than SQL!" thing still going on?
How are NoSql databases more productive than SQL?
A reminder that NoSQL stands for "not only SQL"
Is any of that really less the case with NoSQL?
You might wanna read/watch something about "typical SQL" databases (MySQL?) to compliment the NoSQL. Enjoy!
NoSQL databases are just throwing money to a problem
What other prominent NoSQL databases eventually implemented SQL for queries?
You don't need a different NoSQL database, you need a relational database.
As usual, the confusion and religious comments are numerous. There is no such thing as "nosql". There are different types of databases, with traditional relational being useful for 95% of scenarios (especially on increasingly fast servers with decent replication features) while the rest of the time something more specific is needed.SQL is just an interface, obviously common to relational databases but can be applied to any datastore. Spark/Drill/Presto/Dremio/etc