Navy UAP Pilot Sightings

Cluster debates the authenticity of UFO/UAP videos and sightings by Navy pilots, corroborated by radar, FLIR, and visual confirmations, against skeptical explanations like glitches, lens flares, or balloons.

πŸ“‰ Falling 0.2x Science
2,365
Comments
19
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#4796
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2008
1
2009
7
2010
20
2011
12
2012
16
2013
27
2014
58
2015
29
2016
44
2017
120
2018
74
2019
313
2020
219
2021
480
2022
211
2023
431
2024
165
2025
131
2026
7

Keywords

II DEA FLIR youtu.be IR youtube.com SME NASA FLIR1 arstechnica.com pilots radar aircraft videos object video plane saw drones drone

Sample Comments

deepnotderp β€’ Feb 6, 2023 β€’ View on HN

ITT:Multiple fighter pilots (whose sole job is to understand aerial objects by eye and sensors), radar, camera and infrared have seen these.β€œIt’s a glitch, lens flare and/or the pilots are stupid, but me a programmer is an expert in this.”

mncharity β€’ May 3, 2020 β€’ View on HN

Quoting https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23006754 :> This comment on ArsTechnica on the same subject links to some videos which have nice explanations for the videos: https://arstechn

noetic_techy β€’ Jun 2, 2019 β€’ View on HN

Watch the recreation, it buzzed more than one aircraft:https://youtu.be/PRgoisHRmUERadar Contact + FLIR Contact (videos) + Human Eyeball confirmation by two types aircraft + multiple eyewitness testimony != a technical anomaly nor a hallucination

jml7c5 β€’ Feb 5, 2023 β€’ View on HN

Weren't there only four witnesses? The pilots were the only ones who saw anything with their own eyes. And there's been no release of sensor data or video, so it's hard to judge its quality. (The 'FLIR1' video was taken later, by different pilots who did not see their object visually, and simply shows a distant hot object slowly moving left, with no inexplicable manoeuvers.) That the ship radar was purportedly bouncing between maximum altitude and reasonable altitude sug

colordrops β€’ Sep 10, 2022 β€’ View on HN

It's not just blurry photos. There are also military pilot sightings corroborated with radar and FLIR, and the vehicles move in ways not possible with currently available human technology and science.

153957 β€’ Apr 28, 2020 β€’ View on HN

This comment on ArsTechnica on the same subject links to some videos which have nice explanations for the videos: https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/04/navy-releases-three-...Basically lens flare, balloon, and a plane.

djsumdog β€’ Dec 22, 2019 β€’ View on HN

The pilots claim they physically saw it too. And the pilot who made the video was the 2nd group up from the first who claimed they saw it from their cockpits.And the FLIR was tracking the target moving. If it was a piece of dust stuck on, it would have looked as if it were moving the same speed of the aircraft, wouldn't it?

trenchpilgrim β€’ Sep 10, 2025 β€’ View on HN

From the video and analysis, we can see the footage is consistent with a man-made aircraft such as an airplane or drone. So these seem likeliest.Unfortunately we don't have any public radar data to evaluate - only hearsay which is very often unreliable.

perseusprime11 β€’ Sep 19, 2019 β€’ View on HN

I've seen those videos. The objects were at 80,000 ft traveling at Sonic speeds as recorded by jets flying in the vicinity. The object also took a sudden left so fast that our radars could not lock in the position. All to say that it is ok to entertain that these are not identified by human technology and they may not be our drones.

TeMPOraL β€’ Sep 19, 2019 β€’ View on HN

Reports may be credible, but the reporting on that reporting less so. The way I understand it, some people saw some thing, FLIR saw some thing, a ship radar is claimed to have seen some things, but there's little to actually connect these observations as being the same thing.My current best theory is that pilots were seeing a reflection on the surface of water and got confused because FLIR had a possibly unrelated and buggy interaction between an internal reflection in optics and