Nuclear Disasters Impacts

Discussions debate the severity, radiation effects, exclusion zones, casualties, and long-term habitability from Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear accidents, often comparing them to other scenarios or defending nuclear safety.

📉 Falling 0.2x Science
4,557
Comments
19
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#4776
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2008
1
2009
12
2010
11
2011
485
2012
56
2013
177
2014
120
2015
177
2016
211
2017
400
2018
146
2019
563
2020
366
2021
426
2022
656
2023
379
2024
178
2025
173
2026
20

Keywords

CBS IMHO E4 OK AC CNN geoengineeringwatch.org HN www.ft tandfonline.com chernobyl fukushima radiation nuclear zone accident disaster radioactive exclusion area

Sample Comments

javagram Jan 9, 2020 View on HN

Chernobyl exploded and caught on fire and burned, leading radioactive smoke to spread hundreds of miles. Isn’t this similar to the scenario you propose? We’ve already seen what happens (42 immediate casualties, 1000s of cancer cases). But Europe is still a livable continent, it didn’t turn into the scene of a Fallout video game or whatever.In comparison, the 2011 Tsunami in Japan killed 15,000, yet people are still allowed to live near the ocean...

paines Jun 23, 2019 View on HN

So, you haven't heard about Chernobyl nor Fukushima?!? Maybe stop reading hackernews and go to CNN and Wikipedia pal!

dboreham Oct 17, 2021 View on HN

Analysis of the Chernobyl accident suggests that this is not quite truehttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00295450.2017.1...

master-lincoln Feb 26, 2024 View on HN

Wasn't it rather events like in Chernobyl and Fukushima?

ponorin Jul 16, 2023 View on HN

the exclusion zone of fukushima hasn't changed since the beginning even after 10+ years. same for pripyat and chernobyl, those already close to 40 years. UK had to test sheep for radioactivity in certain domestic areas up until 2012.nuclear damages aren't just dead humans. they come in the forms of lost lands and untrustable food source.

gus_massa Feb 3, 2023 View on HN

I agree. Something like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kramatorsk_radiological_accide... linked in another thread.

TheOtherHobbes Apr 22, 2015 View on HN

There is a "not yet" with Fukushima.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disas...As usual with long-term exposure, cause of death becomes a statistical and actuarial question.Incidentally, Chernobyl almost sterilised large areas of Europe and Russia. One of the official documentaries explains what would have happened

jhallenworld Nov 4, 2015 View on HN

Are you kidding? Even if you completely ignore the radiation, the amount of disruption caused by the disaster caused a huge amount of pain, suffering and death.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_the_Chernobyl_disas...

aaaaaaaaaaab Apr 17, 2022 View on HN

Reminds me of: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kramatorsk_radiological_accide...

eande Mar 31, 2011 View on HN

It starts to sicken me to see all these nuclear energy supporters telling us how safe and limited the effect this accident has. I just don’t see it this way. The situation is getting worse and the long term effects are not all that clear for the region and Japan overall.It just amazes me to see TV shows showing us the Tschernobyl aftermath with this deep impact to the people and region. Some reports state that 4000 were killed while others state 200’000. Hard to extrapolate what the real fact