Kids and Climate Change

This cluster debates the environmental impact of having children, contrasting views that reproduction exacerbates overpopulation and climate issues with arguments that future generations are needed to innovate solutions.

📉 Falling 0.3x Politics & Society
3,810
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#4775
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
1
2008
8
2009
25
2010
32
2011
23
2012
43
2013
71
2014
74
2015
86
2016
145
2017
200
2018
285
2019
462
2020
331
2021
482
2022
400
2023
517
2024
384
2025
230
2026
11

Keywords

CO2 FOR EVEN kids children having kids having children climate change climate people kids future planet population

Sample Comments

toasterlovin May 21, 2020 View on HN

The carrying capacity of the earth will be reached whether you have children or not. So the consideration is different: whose descendants will take up that carrying capacity. If you, as a person concerned about the environment, opt to have children, then, statistically speaking, you are biasing the future composition of the human population toward being more concerned about the environment (since your kids share you innate predispositions and will be raised in the familial and cultural milieu th

hyperbovine Dec 23, 2016 View on HN

Having kids is a far more selfish act than not. Our species and our planet would be way, way better off if about 9/10 of us elected not to reproduce for a few generations.

rtpg Nov 13, 2022 View on HN

You’re in a bubble if you think that people are not having kids to save the environment

dazc Jan 16, 2020 View on HN

Most people who choose to have children don't do so to enable society structures to persist though. I could argue that by not having kids I'm saving the planet from the effects of over population?

Damogran6 Aug 31, 2021 View on HN

Then your kids won't have a chance to make it better.I'm all for lessening the load of the population on the planet...I see that happening now. But I don't think it means not ever having kids.

shortrounddev2 Aug 17, 2023 View on HN

Not having children is actually making the world a worse place. If your decision to/not to have children is about your impact on the world, you should choose to have several children

pcstl Jul 2, 2019 View on HN

Not having children because of climate change really seems like a terrible idea. More people increase humanity's power to solve problems.

codegrappler Oct 14, 2022 View on HN

I tend to have a more optimistic view of life and I have 3 kids. I want to support a world that makes things better for them. I’ve always found the “make less people” claim overly patronizing. It’s fine if you don’t want kids, but the kids today will be running the nursing homes, fixing the infrastructure and running the country when we’re retired. I want to help raise this next generation with good moral values and work ethics. I should be able to make that choice.

anoxor Feb 18, 2024 View on HN

(Implies the lesser human who think having kids isn’t a low key evil for killing the earth)

pb7 Jan 14, 2022 View on HN

You’re making a lot of assumptions about me knowing nothing about what I do or will do in the future. For the record, having kids is not a noble deed and does not automatically result in a better future. Overpopulation is a burden on society. Having kids is a mostly selfish act because most people would rather have their own kids than for someone else to have more kids and they have none. Besides, who is going to finally enjoy this better future? Or are we just supposed to perpetually kick the c