Retroactive Laws Debate
The cluster focuses on discussions about the retroactive application of laws, ex-post facto prohibitions, and whether past actions can be prosecuted under new legislation. Commenters debate the impossibility or rarity of retroactive laws and implications for current practices becoming illegal in the future.
Activity Over Time
Top Contributors
Keywords
Sample Comments
Aren't retroactive laws a thing?
Legislation can be changed. Including retroactively.
the entire argument is that you can not apply laws retroactively.
I don't know if you're aware of this, but laws cannot be applied retroactively.
You can’t retroactively apply laws, thankfully.
What's legal and recorded today might be retroactively prosecuted as a crime tomorrow.
It's possible that laws have to be passed to prohibit it, in which case ex-post facto prevents the current and past practices to be prosecuted.
yes, but apparently the law hasn't been updated to allow for that, and legal people get confused by it. what is it that triggers the process of reviewing and revising/removing an outdated law when an entity breaks it? it's obvious that there could be thousands of laws that were made, that are now out of date because of advances in technology or scientific understanding. so isn't there some regular procedure for, when someone sues someone, allowing for the opportunity to consi
Agreed, it doesn't make any sense to apply those rules retroactively.
It's a shame no one can rewrite the law should circumstances change. /s