DSLR to Mirrorless Shift

The cluster discusses the transition from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, highlighting Nikon and Canon's delayed adoption, advantages of mirrorless like EVFs and video, and the decline of traditional SLRs.

📉 Falling 0.3x Hardware
3,103
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#4715
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
1
2008
3
2009
10
2010
28
2011
31
2012
56
2013
72
2014
74
2015
49
2016
172
2017
256
2018
245
2019
201
2020
427
2021
274
2022
522
2023
250
2024
228
2025
189
2026
15

Keywords

M43 OVF IMHO discontinuation.html A7RII bythom.com discontinuation.h LCD MirrorlessRumors EVF mirrorless canon cameras lenses sony camera dslr mount sensor market

Sample Comments

sp332 Apr 19, 2017 View on HN

Don't Canon and Nikon make pretty good mirrorless cameras too?

jillesvangurp Dec 21, 2020 View on HN

Nikon has a nice mirrorless series of cameras (the Z-series). Both Canon and Nikon have gotten more serious on that front over the last few years. Especially their full frame mirrorless offerings are pretty nice and competitive. Sony is still considered quite good in this space but it is a lot closer than it was a few years ago.I also bought a Fuji this year (X-T30), upgrading from an old Canon Rebel. I'm so far really liking it. For me it's as much about the form-factor as it is ab

_ph_ Jul 12, 2022 View on HN

The end of an era, but Nikon is following a lot of other manufacturers like Olympus, Sony, Leica. SLRs were a great product, but about 10 years ago, mirrorless cameras started to overtake them in many aspects. The EVF has many advantages, of course especially for video recording. All new camera models now are mirrorless. Like analog SLRs gave way to DSLRs, now the migration to mirrorless is going to be finished. I wouldn't expect Canon to stick to DSLRs much longer either.

serge2k Oct 20, 2016 View on HN

wait, this is a DSLR?Why would they do that instead of mirrorless?

cletus Jan 15, 2022 View on HN

I get why this is happening but it still makes me sad. There's really no better experience than being able to look through the viewfinder, track the target and have a pretty good idea of the composition (the viewfinder is typically 95-99% of the frame). Any mirrorless system has limitations on low light and latency (of reading the light and then displaying it on a separate screen). This has gotten better but it can never really compete with the sensitivity of a human eye and low latency of

paulornothing Dec 2, 2014 View on HN

You mean something like the mirror less offerings that Samsung and Sony have?

rich_sasha Jun 1, 2021 View on HN

One point of interest is that Nikon and Canon, the giants of DSLRs, were very resistant to do mirrorless, even as Sony, Fuji and Olympus went down that way. They are now going into mirrorless big time.Part of it I guess is that the technology got better, but also oh what an excuse to sell everyone their lenses again! You can use adapters on older lenses, but usually with some (minor) loss of optical quality, and more clunkiness - bit like with dongles I guess! Old DSLR lines are also being ph

emkoemko Sep 15, 2022 View on HN

get a mirrorless... DSLR are old, can't even compare these 48mp images to say a Sony at 48mp well i guess if your not that into printing large and only viewing your images on facebook i guess its fine.

mcbuilder Mar 10, 2025 View on HN

Too bad Nikon practically stopped making DSLRs

ehnto Jun 26, 2020 View on HN

I see photography gear and companies as more diverse than when I first started getting into the hobby 10 years ago. Maybe I just didn't see other companies, but when I got into it, only Nikon and Canon were doing prosumer DSLRs. Now that technology has moved on and DSLRs aren't the One True Camera, I would say that Sony, Pentax, Canon, Fuji, Olympus and Nikon are all squarely in the prosumer market with a good range from low to high end. I sold all my Canon bodies and L glass to switch