FUSE Filesystem Comparisons

Discussions center on comparing a specific filesystem or mounting tool to FUSE, debating its use, Linux-specific limitations, and possibilities for FUSE-based implementations or alternatives.

📉 Falling 0.5x DevOps & Infrastructure
3,381
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#4591
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
1
2008
9
2009
26
2010
50
2011
53
2012
83
2013
125
2014
110
2015
133
2016
237
2017
213
2018
182
2019
249
2020
242
2021
267
2022
333
2023
384
2024
364
2025
290
2026
30

Keywords

RAM LFS e.g SSD OSX USN FUSE E2 FS RHEL fuse mount filesystem file linux fs loop sudo device driver

Sample Comments

jeegsy • Jan 6, 2024 • View on HN

Someone help me out, whats the difference between this and the way FS are usually mounted?

hackermom • Sep 8, 2011 • View on HN

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't FUSE allow this as well?

kristianp • Nov 29, 2020 • View on HN

I think it uses FUSE, which is linux specific.

deaddabe • Jan 15, 2023 • View on HN

On Linux, this could be done using an userspace FUSE driver I guess.

ape4 • Jan 12, 2018 • View on HN

Too bad he couldn't use FUSE. Would be nice to do `ls` and other commands with this.

edpichler • Mar 13, 2024 • View on HN

Cool! Does it work in any file system?

strickjb9 • Jan 20, 2026 • View on HN

Real question - are you not worried about access to /mnt/c ?

darkstalker • May 23, 2012 • View on HN

A FUSE filesystem interface would be the best, so you can mount it

batgaijin • Oct 26, 2012 • View on HN

I thought they had a kernel module or something bypassing the need for fuse.

riku_iki • Nov 8, 2023 • View on HN

That's not up to me. It is Linux virtual fs implemented that way