Nature of Genius

Comments debate the definition, existence, and characteristics of genius, questioning if it's domain-specific, general, innate, or overhyped, with examples from scientists, programmers, and historical figures.

📉 Falling 0.3x Politics & Society
3,960
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#4410
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
24
2008
69
2009
109
2010
144
2011
131
2012
165
2013
159
2014
138
2015
139
2016
185
2017
287
2018
225
2019
285
2020
232
2021
401
2022
479
2023
308
2024
266
2025
195
2026
19

Keywords

e.g IMHO LLM YMMV DJ MacArthur wikipedia.org genius geniuses dick talent extraordinary ability social skills feynman rivals strongly disagree

Sample Comments

sigzero Jul 30, 2013 View on HN

Sometimes that "genius" doesn't translate into other areas.

ultimatedelman Jan 24, 2014 View on HN

being a genius in one thing doesn't always translate into others ;)

mikecane Apr 21, 2010 View on HN

Genius? Or just highly-skilled?

jacobolus Dec 26, 2016 View on HN

After having interacted with many people who were called “geniuses” in various settings (e.g. Nobel Prize winners, Fields medalists, best-selling novelists, at least a half dozen MacArthur “genius” grant recipients ...), I don’t consider “genius in any general sense” to be a real thing. YMMV.

Rochus Mar 5, 2024 View on HN

I guess not everyone can be a genius (like you?)

est31 Sep 22, 2022 View on HN

I wouldn't be so sure about your claim, there were plenty of universal geniuses: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PolymathAnd even today such people exist. Encountering them is often quite an experience. Seeing them being better than you at almost everything is on one hand really nice, on the other hand it makes you wonder what you did wrong. Such folks are usually quite rare though,

softbuilder Oct 30, 2011 View on HN

I think a lot of smart people cling to the idea that they have the capacity for genius because they can solve hard problems or because they have created something interesting or unique. But when you see real genius, it works differently than that. It's not a matter of more processing power, it's a different perspective. Maybe Jobs had that, maybe he didn't. But to tie genius strictly to "intellectual capacity" is a mistake IMHO.

notorandit Oct 18, 2025 View on HN

I think that's one of the huge gaps between a genius and an average man.

jpgvm Mar 16, 2022 View on HN

There are modern day geniuses, they just look different to the big name scientists he is lamenting.I would argue Fabrice Bellard should be in contention, DJ Bernstein, etc. There are geniuses all around us and that is what has changed. It's by no means normalized but extraordinary doesn't seem as extraordinary when the world is literally powered by tens of thousands of extraordinary people doing awesome things day in and day out.Those are just two public examples I can think of,

FrankWilhoit Aug 31, 2024 View on HN

The background of this particular case is interesting, but the larger point is that what we call "genius" is a matter of priorities. From some angle, every gifted person appears mad.