Abortion Rights Debate
The cluster centers on heated discussions about abortion rights, pro-life vs. pro-choice positions, related legislation like Alabama's laws, and debates over its appropriateness on Hacker News.
Activity Over Time
Top Contributors
Keywords
Sample Comments
Why do you need those reasons? It doesn't like pro-abortion, it's anti-abortion by limiting its use cases. If you are pro-abortion, you would happily suggest any pregnant women to abort their babies.
why is this anti-abortion bullshit on hacker news, shouldn't the standard here be quite a bit higher?
No it seems like an abortion issue to me. You don't see the same advocates for drug use, prostitution, or assisted suicide
It is fun to cherry-pick the most favorable facts for your argument from a source.This[0] Time article is the [9] from your wikipedia copypasta. It discusses details of 6 pieces of conservative abortion legislation. The Alabama law you link is the only one with a provision to "prevent serious health risk to the mother". The rest all use the much higher bar of "serious risk of the substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function". All ban abortions startin
It's referring to abortion arguments.
Not sure what you seem to refer to. If it is abortion, then that is restricted in the same spirit as murder is prohibited.
Might be about reproductive rights and abortion.
I don't have a strong opinion on abortion.But two replies to refurb's comment and both ignore the matter at hand in order to change the conversation in a new direction.The matter at hand here is whether or not it would be considered breaking the law to abort a fetus, not how that process is financed or whether the population understands that intercourse can lead to pregnancy.And in that matter—legality of abortion—refurb was pointed out that the US is not necessarily less &quo
It's not 'obviously absurd' because a significant amount of the pro-life people pushing the anti-abortion rhetoric believe no abortion should be allowed and that all fetuses have rights, period. Like the fact that this debate still exists even after this constitutional amendment supposedly crosses both aisles does not fix the problem at all.
I don't see how this thinking is any different than banning abortions. It's not your problem so shush.