Bike Helmet Debate

This cluster centers on debates about the effectiveness of bicycle helmets in preventing injuries, risk compensation effects, barriers to cycling adoption, and arguments for or against mandatory helmet laws.

📉 Falling 0.1x Health
4,465
Comments
19
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#4267
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2008
5
2009
52
2010
68
2011
20
2012
194
2013
272
2014
246
2015
387
2016
245
2017
167
2018
390
2019
352
2020
201
2021
248
2022
1,011
2023
293
2024
171
2025
137
2026
6

Keywords

www.iihs forbes.com US IMO MIPS TBI theatlantic.com TED mipsprotection.com org.nz helmet bike cycling wear cyclists accidents wearing bicycle accident biking

Sample Comments

rmvt Dec 5, 2022 View on HN

just don't leave your house. it protects you from getting run over, being robbed at gunpoint, heartbreak, etc. do you see where your logic fails?this is not news. wearing helmets has been associated with a range of negative issues for years now. (https://road.cc/content/news/268605-wearing-cycle-helmet-may..., <

EugeneOZ Jun 24, 2020 View on HN

Happens with bikes as well. People wear helmets for a reason.

avnigo Aug 31, 2021 View on HN

What you wrote reminded me of an article on the bike helmet paradox:https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/03/the-bike-...

stfp May 22, 2022 View on HN

One flaw in this logic: helmets don't protect against cars ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

andreasvc Aug 24, 2012 View on HN

Wearing a helmet is attacking the symptom and not the cause. The cause is that you're biking in a bike-unfriendly environment where the odds are against you. A better solution would be to educate drivers better and assign them more responsibility if something goes wrong, and introduce bike lanes etc.

chrisbaker98 Dec 5, 2022 View on HN

What possible reason is there to not wear a helmet when riding a bike?

throwAwayCity May 19, 2019 View on HN

Most cyclists get serious head injuries when they get dinged by cars, of which helmets pretty much offer no protection from, so it is reasonable to not wear a helmet IMO when cycling (except for in rainy/icy conditions where single bicycle accidents are likely).

papalalu Sep 30, 2012 View on HN

the fact is that a helmet is not enough to guarantee your safety - if cycling without one is "nuts", cycling with one is too.

panglott Jun 15, 2015 View on HN

Absolutely, this is why I rarely/never wear a helmet. People think of them as essential safety gear in case you get hit by a car, but they offer almost no protection against this risk. They are designed to protect your head if you spontaneously fall off a stationary bicycle. In good weather, at low speeds, on flat, clean roads, these accidents will be very rare for competent cyclists.Cycling is simply a safe, fun means of travel. And you don't need special protective gear unless you

brnt Oct 23, 2019 View on HN

The point is to make cycling the norm. Adding items you need to wear or have (you could mandate a cycling license for instance) increases the barrier to entry and thus use. Moreover, helmets protect only for certain accidents, accidents which are some of the most uncommon.The danger comes mostly from bad infra design and other heavier traffic (cars). Those can be addressed separately, and it turns out pretty well. Leading causes of bike-accidents are now cyclists being distracted by their pho