Local vs State Control

The cluster discusses the merits and drawbacks of local governments handling issues autonomously versus state or federal intervention, emphasizing local accountability, subsidiarity, and the US federalism structure.

📉 Falling 0.3x Politics & Society
3,071
Comments
19
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#4232
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2008
4
2009
8
2010
33
2011
21
2012
29
2013
60
2014
81
2015
76
2016
185
2017
265
2018
235
2019
293
2020
334
2021
299
2022
358
2023
366
2024
185
2025
227
2026
12

Keywords

NY US FL UX GOP DOT TX LAC NYC McNealy local state federal government federal government governments level local government state federal state level

Sample Comments

jfb Sep 26, 2015 View on HN

Imagine a state where decisions about local concerns are handled by local government, rather than getting kicked up to the statehouse.

Retric Aug 20, 2023 View on HN

Local governments have finite power given to them by state and federal government. So, the argument is more that state and federal government should actually exercise their authority to fix the underlying problem.Abstractly hyper local optimization is suboptimal.

TimTheTinker Jun 8, 2021 View on HN

That article is talking about local governments, not the federal government.

thenewwazoo Jan 31, 2023 View on HN

All politics is local. Every citizen of a city is also a citizen of the state. "Local" is a demarcation drawn where ever it's convenient for the speaker. A smaller group should not be able to supersede the superior authority at the larger polity's expense.In this case, the locally-optimal choices cities are making is having deleterious effects on the quality of life of the citizens of the state as a whole. It is perfectly reasonable for the state to therefore

dantheman Aug 15, 2011 View on HN

It's easier for people to control their government at the local level, than at the national level. For instance, the city of Cambridge a year or so ago removed all the DHS cameras that were put up after 9/11. That wouldn't happen if they were controlled at the national level. Look at gay marriage or marijuana, only a problem at the national level - let the states do what they want; it's less of a chance of one group going in and ruining it for everyone. Sure, it's probably not optimal there

Jayschwa Oct 18, 2013 View on HN

Local governments != Federal government. The Federal government could be significantly castrated without too many problems for most people. Dysfunctional local government is what I'd lose sleep over.

duskwuff Dec 6, 2020 View on HN

That's... not something that state or local authorities have the ability to do.

Eumenes Apr 19, 2023 View on HN

Whats wrong with locals deciding local issues?

CamTin Sep 12, 2018 View on HN

It's tough politics for state legislatures to say "fuck you, cities, we're centralizing control in {Austin,Springfield,Albany}". They will essentially only do it if they are fearful of challenges in the next election by big money. In other words, states tend only to take over traditionally local issues when local government passes some ordinance odious to industry (see fracking in PA, Uber/Lyft background checks in Austin, etc.)

huffmsa Dec 23, 2018 View on HN

Can't read the article because the economist Saya I've read my free monthly limit.If the article is about governmental districts, it's because Americans are predisposed to having lots of small localized governments.Don't like what the guys 5 miles over are doing? Incorporate a township and run your own government.