AI-Generated Images Debate

Reaction for overusing nonsenses like AI art. I need explanation about how art could be generated.

including ai generated illustrations in your articles or presentations is very cringe

I find it interesting that it doesn't recognises AI generated images (on the other hand maybe it's intentional).

Did anyone else find the AI generated "art" more distracting than helpful?

The AI art is there mainly because the page would be pretty empty otherwise, and I wanted to have some fun generating images :)

Thanks for pointing out the discrepancy! Some people don't like generative images, but they're pretty fun to generate.

Are those images ai generated? Some of them are pretty high quality.

I enjoyed it :) I see a lot of complaints about the ai generation. My 2c would be the photorealistic style is throwing people off a bit. Painting/artistic renderings might do it better justice

Why are they using these atrocious AI generated images? seems there are better ways to convey unhinged people

i'm fine if the call it artist impression without calling it AI generated. i don't care if the artist's impression was created in watercolors, oil, charcoal, or AI. as long as it is identified as not an actual image is the main concern