Free Speech Incitement

The cluster debates the legal boundaries of online speech, distinguishing protected opinions from illegal incitement to violence, true threats, and hate speech, often contrasting US protections with stricter UK laws.

➡️ Stable 0.7x Legal
4,318
Comments
19
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#3888
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2008
4
2009
31
2010
35
2011
56
2012
148
2013
214
2014
129
2015
128
2016
170
2017
246
2018
239
2019
311
2020
267
2021
518
2022
529
2023
370
2024
305
2025
592
2026
26

Keywords

e.g US www.cps youtube.com www.bbc HN twitter.com en.m i.e HK violence speech illegal offensive arrested law crime uk imminent gif

Sample Comments

mc32 Aug 10, 2024 View on HN

I think you'd have trouble prosecuting this in the US. Lots of people say awful things on X/Twitter. Mostly they are outbursts, or seeking some form of social credit. Just look at what people say about political candidates in the US. If you say something totally outrageous toward a political candidate, you may get a visit from the SS, but rarely, rarely, unless they have materiel or other immediate intent are they prosecuted/jailed. IIRC, Greenday, a few days after an attempte

jkaplowitz Jun 6, 2020 View on HN

A lot of freedom of speech policies and preferences, including US criminal law, make exceptions for speech that is likely to incite imminent violence. Look up the "true threat" doctrine. I'm not surprised that HN sentiment has a similar exception.

Dylan16807 Jul 1, 2012 View on HN

You'll still get in trouble in the US if you're inciting specific crimes. But "all them ___ should be shot" is just a (bad) opinion. And you can impotently rant about those all you want.

tene80i Mar 12, 2025 View on HN

What are you talking about?! Do you mean “ideas” like publicly inciting violence? Because that’s illegal in the USA too.

asabjorn Mar 28, 2019 View on HN

Incitement to imminent violent action is illegal https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_lawless_action

thisone Apr 18, 2013 View on HN

If by here you mean the US, there are still laws against incitement which could be dragged out depending on the circumstances.

nrawe Feb 28, 2025 View on HN

You seem to have overlooked the clause 179.1.C. If I send a death threat to someone, or I incite violence by spreading misinformation (like happened in Southport) there are consequences.That's what it covers, not a random tweet that says "I think the sky is actually green".

homonculus1 Aug 12, 2022 View on HN

I express many unpopular opinions online, including right here on Hackernews. If offending people online is a criminal offense, then my freedom and standing in law-abiding society are at risk. Your posts are genuinely and seriously offensive to me because you are defending something which poses a direct material threat against me personally, as a hypothetical UK citizen.Is it conceivable that the UK government would actually interview you to protect me against itself?

shitlord Aug 15, 2023 View on HN

You might be overstating his obligations. In the US, calls for violence are illegal if they are imminent and likely. But you're still allowed to advocate for violence in more abstract ways (e.g., "all pedophiles should be shot").He should really find something else to work on.

bergstromm466 Dec 25, 2020 View on HN

> Imagine the police turning up and arresting you for that commenthttps://twitter.com/_SecondThought/status/133274617257067725...