x86 Architecture Future

The cluster discusses the history, ownership (especially AMD's role in x86-64), Intel's failed Itanium push, backwards compatibility, and potential decline or transition away from x86 dominance.

➡️ Stable 0.5x Hardware
4,382
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#3703
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
1
2008
11
2009
41
2010
56
2011
95
2012
87
2013
121
2014
139
2015
144
2016
267
2017
304
2018
254
2019
278
2020
445
2021
403
2022
340
2023
550
2024
395
2025
441
2026
10

Keywords

MS HAL CPU ARM erlang.org PC AMD SoCs GP ISA x86 64 amd intel architecture ms dos killer instruction set compatibility isa

Sample Comments

blasphemers • Sep 5, 2024 • View on HN

Not sure how much x86 is actually worth considering x86-64 is owned by AMD

DeathArrow • Apr 23, 2020 • View on HN

Weird since Intel tried themselves to kill x86 with IA-64.

dpassens • Oct 9, 2025 • View on HN

That's an x86 thing, though.

verbatim • Aug 14, 2018 • View on HN

The off-brand that invented x86-64? :)

skohan • Jun 23, 2020 • View on HN

What's the issue with x86? Genuinely asking

ddtaylor • Feb 2, 2019 • View on HN

It's x86 all the way down.

aaronbrethorst • Jun 10, 2025 • View on HN

Intel != x86_64. Or, at least, they cannot if they hope to survive.

amelius • Jul 15, 2024 • View on HN

Like supporting x86 was a bad idea as well?

sitkack • Nov 21, 2025 • View on HN

Only x86 can make x86 irrelevant.

plantain • Apr 23, 2014 • View on HN

It's a dream compared to x86...