Qualia and Consciousness

The cluster centers on philosophical discussions of qualia as subjective conscious experiences, including debates on whether machines, animals, or others possess them, philosophical zombies, and the hard problem of consciousness.

📉 Falling 0.3x Science
3,135
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#3518
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
4
2008
11
2009
43
2010
14
2011
19
2012
50
2013
61
2014
62
2015
88
2016
185
2017
219
2018
182
2019
200
2020
279
2021
208
2022
405
2023
431
2024
408
2025
255
2026
11

Keywords

OP LLM stanford.edu LSD illinois.edu wikipedia.org qualia experience subjective conscious brains brain consciousness experiences red zombie

Sample Comments

aliakbarkhan Aug 14, 2014 View on HN

Try looking into qualia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualia

mikeash Dec 18, 2016 View on HN

If I"ve understood you correctly so far, your overall approach to the problem seems to be that if we can't define it in a reasonably rigorous way, then we don't really know what we're referring to, and so it's not real. For example:> I can't help but have a lingering feeling that there must be more to the concept of "subjective experience" than "arbitrary details of the internal implementation of an algorithm that don't affect the results,&

oa335 Feb 15, 2025 View on HN

Philosophers have been discussing this for a while now, you and OP may be interested in their arguments.https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qualia-knowledge/https://courses.physics.illinois.edu/phys419/sp202

daseiner1 Jan 27, 2023 View on HN

Do you understand the concept of qualia? There is no known way to establish whether all/most/some of life has inner experience. That doesn’t entail dismissing the question.

sebastianconcpt May 28, 2015 View on HN

Try to answer this question: why Qualia exists and do you have it? what proof do we have that you are not a well implemented automata? how can we be sure you are not a philosophical zombie? what proof do we have that you are actually experiencing things inside you?

falseprofit Sep 3, 2020 View on HN

the comment you're responding to is referring to qualia, and there is no evidence (Occam's razor doesn't count) that these are shared at all.

abletonlive Feb 4, 2022 View on HN

How can you be so sure there is no experience of being a rock? Surely it's wildly different from being a finger or a person, and perhaps, very boring from a human's perspective. I'm not sure why everybody insists you can have qualia or you can't, as if it's a binary thing. Perhaps it's a gradient. I would say there is something like being a plant, or something like being a computer program. Just because we are unable to imagine it as humans does not mean that it doe

jschwartzi Jan 31, 2020 View on HN

It's a quale: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualia

lone_haxx0r Jul 24, 2019 View on HN

> The problem is that there could conceivably be brains that perform all the same sensory and decision-making functions as ours but in which there is no conscious experience. That is, there could be brains that react as though sad but that don’t feel sadness, brains that can discriminate between wavelengths of light but that don’t see red or yellow or blue or any other color, brains that direct their bodies to eat certain foods but that don’t taste them. So why is there nevertheless something

plutonorm Dec 13, 2021 View on HN

Examine your own experience. Pinch yourself. Attempt to deny the salience of that experience. Now attempt to explain that subjective experience arising from pure matter.