Automation Job Impact

The cluster debates the effects of automation on employment, including whether it eliminates jobs, creates new opportunities, reduces labor demand, or exacerbates economic inequality.

➡️ Stable 0.5x Career & Jobs
5,517
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#3512
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
1
2008
7
2009
18
2010
55
2011
96
2012
71
2013
235
2014
193
2015
250
2016
547
2017
738
2018
460
2019
505
2020
377
2021
330
2022
398
2023
463
2024
322
2025
431
2026
20

Keywords

e.g AI CRUD S557XQU HN EVERYONE ATM youtube.com U.S CGP automation jobs labor workers routine automated job automate people jobs worker

Sample Comments

oblio May 29, 2019 View on HN

Jobs are down due to automation, nobody's putting that genie back in the bottle :)

zem Apr 3, 2025 View on HN

guess their jobs were just automatted away!

pasquinelli Feb 3, 2023 View on HN

seems that as automation has increased bullshit jobs have too, so that future seems very plausible to me.

bogota Sep 19, 2021 View on HN

Being treated like garbage and a job inherently being shitty aren’t the same thing. People seem to confuse that.All this is doing is driving automation at a faster pace and the people who once did the jobs will now have something new to complain about when they have no job available at all in 10 years

smsm42 Mar 12, 2013 View on HN

Automation does not reduce available labor - it reduces only the number of specific workplaces available, but since it frees the resources by doing it and produces more value, this value can - and will - be turned into buying work of somebody else. Maybe instead of buying services of a clerk, the owner of the company would buy services of a Ford dealer and Ford workers by buying a new car. So what? I have no reasons to prefer clerk's job for Ford dealer's job - the only difference is that people

ars Jan 8, 2014 View on HN

You need to go to the next level. People automate things not to eliminate jobs (that's not the whole point), but to save money. So now the product is cheaper.So the buyers of the product have extra money to spend - which opens whole new fields of products and services for them, which will (at first) be run by humans and have jobs.It's a cycle that repeated many many times in history. It's just happening faster now. So if you want to always be employable (and you are not part

blancheneige Jan 4, 2019 View on HN

see my comment above. the job market these people are supposedly propping up is going to get wiped out by automation in a few decades, thus only exacerbating the problem.

EGreg Sep 26, 2013 View on HN

Yeah. I think most people in HN don't view automation as a bad force. But we do have to note there's no guarantee that jobs will come back for EVERYONE and that over time the demand for human labor won't decrease. Most people already don't concern themselves with growing/hunting food, obtaining water, warming/cooling themselves, etc. We've moved on to other things, freed up by advances in technology. Perhaps the current "busywork" of blogging, account

delegate May 17, 2017 View on HN

Why are you so convinced that it's not happening ?Each time something, which used to be done by humans, is done by a machine, that time spent doing that something is no longer payed to a human and only a fraction goes to the makers of the machine - that's the whole point of automation - reduce costs and increase productivity.It doesn't lead to [more] humans being payed more money.I think intuitively it makes sense, but coming up with undeniable proof is quit

waterlesscloud May 16, 2015 View on HN

What if it's automation and not people being productive?