Multicellular Life Evolution

The cluster discusses the origins and rarity of multicellular organisms, focusing on transitions from unicellular prokaryotes to eukaryotes via endosymbiosis (e.g., mitochondria), the absence of multicellular bacteria, and evolutionary challenges like symbiogenesis.

📉 Falling 0.5x Science
2,336
Comments
19
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#3441
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
1
2009
10
2010
65
2011
22
2012
34
2013
34
2014
50
2015
77
2016
163
2017
96
2018
136
2019
191
2020
211
2021
189
2022
201
2023
299
2024
314
2025
232
2026
11

Keywords

LUCA pmc.ncbi viewtopic.php jstor.org SEM quantamagazine.org ATP PMC6343361 amazon.com photomacrography.net organisms cells cell organism bacteria life oxygen complex earth evolution

Sample Comments

joshuahedlund Nov 8, 2024 View on HN

Might be referring to this: https://newatlas.com/biology/life-merger-evolution-symbiosis...

asdasdsddd Jan 27, 2025 View on HN

Can someone explain why there arent more multicellular bacteria?

sabujp Mar 24, 2020 View on HN

why can't they just say "first multi-cellular organism"

goku12 Sep 7, 2025 View on HN

Multicellular life seems to have appeared independently from unicellular life several times in the past, including 6 instances of complex multicellular life from eukaryotic cells, that led to animals and land plants. It may also have happened repeatedly, with some disappearing altogether in course of time. Another important aspect of life is the extreme prevalance of symbiosis, even among unicellular life. It's even theorized that the genesis of the entire Eukaryota domain and many of its o

Evgeny Sep 27, 2010 View on HN

A point to consider is the probability that microbes ever evolve into something more complex (multicellular organisms). After all, there are huge amounts of bacteria on Earth these days, but I'm not aware of any cases of them evolving into more complex organisms in the last billion year or so.A book called "Power, Sex, Suicide: Mitochondria and the Meaning of Life" provides some insights. The author argues that the only reason multicellular organisms evolved is that one type of cells ("host")

Terr_ Jan 27, 2025 View on HN

Not yet, it seems to be an open question.See: "The Mystery of the Missing Multicellular Prokaryotes"https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-mystery-of-the-missing-mu...

arnidg Oct 11, 2022 View on HN

> Are we a result of similar microorganisms?I'm no biologist, but from what I've read: Probably not. A really important fact about multicellular life is that each cell is genetically identical to any other cell in the organism. Otherwise, different cells will start competing with one another, until the relationship falls apart. In nature, symbiosis only works because each cell has an independent means of reproduction, and that always puts a limit to how close the cooperation can

contingencies Sep 7, 2025 View on HN

It's even theorized that the genesis of the entire Eukaryota domain and many of its organnelles (notably mitochondria and chloroplasts) are the results of repeated cellular endosymbiosis where a unicellular organism consumed a prokaryote that eventually becomes a useful part of the host cell instead of its food.A parallel could be drawn with CVCs acquiring startups. Or tiger penis soup. Neither being generally palatable dinner table conversation, but both similarly unlikely consum

Evgeny Apr 8, 2010 View on HN

So what is it that they have in place of mitochondiria?A fascinating book "Power, Sex, Suicide: Mitochondria and the Meaning of Life" (http://www.amazon.com/Power-Sex-Suicide-Mitochondria-Meaning...) suggested that the multicellullar organisms on Earth evolved only once, when the symbiotic relationship between two types of bacteria was formed - one of them became "host", and the other becam

mitthrowaway2 May 3, 2023 View on HN

Perhaps even by biological cells!