Normalization of Deviance
Cluster centers on the 'normalization of deviance' in safety-critical engineering, where repeated minor safety violations become accepted until causing disasters like Challenger and Deepwater Horizon, emphasizing systemic failures over isolated human error.
Activity Over Time
Top Contributors
Keywords
Sample Comments
You have independently discovered a phenomenon that is known as the normalization of deviance. It has been seen in many engineering failures, such as both Space Shuttle crashes, the Deepwater Horizon explosion, etc.https://flightsafety.org/asw-article/normalization-of-devian...
Google the Swiss cheese theory of safety. Very seldom an accident is caused by only one thing going wrong, and very seldom is it caused by only crew error or only technical failure.
This reminds of the human factors issues during the Challenger Disaster:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_Challenger_disas...
Then I think you're still missing the point of the comment you replied to. Chalking something up to "human error" is not a particularly useful conclusion to come to; it doesn't really solve or prevent any problems. The takeaway should be that a system did indeed fail from a design flaw. That system was not the space shuttle as a mechanical device. The system that failed and needed to be re-designed was the process of spacecraft engineering: NASA was lacking in structural ince
exactly. "but this one time nothing happened" is just sloppy complacencythere was this article on the hn front page not longer than a month ago about this very issue https://fastjetperformance.com/podcasts/how-i-almost-destroy...
See the article yesterday about normalization of deviance.https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19770562
I think I would need a bit more detail than this. Most such accidents happen because of human error. There is no indication that there was a software or hardware issue, at this time.
This is worth a read. I think it applies to Chernobyl, Challenger (where it was coined) and the 737 Max.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normalization_of_devianceAll three had known issues (in the case of Chernobyl, for decades), but averting disaster gave people, specifically the engineers, confidence to continue.
"People make mistakes all the time...the problem was that our systems that were designed to recognize and correct human error failed us." [1][1] http://articles.latimes.com/1999/oct/01/news/mn-17288
" Well, I don’t think there is any question about it. It can only be attributable to human error. This sort of thing has cropped up before, and it has always been due to human error." - https://youtu.be/CD9YqdWwwdw