Exponential Growth Debate

Comments revolve around the power, unintuitiveness, and mathematical details of exponential growth, with users debating if phenomena are truly exponential, quadratic, or superexponential, and cautioning against underestimating exponentials.

➡️ Stable 0.5x Science
2,413
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#3375
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
3
2008
18
2009
34
2010
63
2011
127
2012
68
2013
75
2014
131
2015
103
2016
143
2017
107
2018
126
2019
163
2020
191
2021
201
2022
179
2023
254
2024
200
2025
217
2026
10

Keywords

LogSumExp P2P IS fooplot.com index.php wikipedia.org exponential exp function log exponentially formula matrix mathematica pronounce numbers

Sample Comments

prab97 • Aug 8, 2019 • View on HN

Isn't that mathematically exponential, just with a larger base?

hndamien • Jul 25, 2017 • View on HN

Don't underestimate the exponential.

atleastoptimal • Nov 15, 2023 • View on HN

don't underestimate exponentials

msandford • Jun 4, 2021 • View on HN

Sure but what's the exponent?

MauranKilom • Mar 30, 2021 • View on HN

The exponentiation signs got lost in your quote. Would you mind adding them back in?

frabcus • Sep 15, 2020 • View on HN

Exponentials are very unintuitive.

J3L2404 • Dec 19, 2010 • View on HN

Oops. Should be exponentially. :(

lugg • Aug 9, 2019 • View on HN

You know double is exponential right?

oasisaimlessly • Nov 24, 2025 • View on HN

Wouldn't that be quadratic rather than exponential?

adastra22 • Oct 31, 2022 • View on HN

Exponentials are a hell of a thing.