AI Misuse Concerns

The cluster focuses on debates about the potential for advanced AI technology to be abused for harmful purposes, drawing comparisons to nuclear weapons and questioning whether its development should proceed despite risks.

📉 Falling 0.4x AI & Machine Learning
4,251
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#3258
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
6
2008
13
2009
24
2010
38
2011
58
2012
61
2013
147
2014
127
2015
155
2016
159
2017
223
2018
393
2019
304
2020
227
2021
351
2022
381
2023
714
2024
434
2025
397
2026
41

Keywords

AI AGI FUD technology technologies harm weapons consequences fundamental principles nuclear effects intentioned

Sample Comments

excalibur Jun 18, 2021 View on HN

Assuming the technology will not be used for nefarious purposes seems incredibly naive

ceilingcorner Dec 29, 2020 View on HN

You do know that not every ‘advance’ in technology is always good, right?

kyriakos Nov 27, 2022 View on HN

Every kind of technology can be abused, doesn't mean progress should stop.

rexpop Nov 2, 2020 View on HN

The question isn't "what's wrong with the technology," but rather "what harm can it do in the context of our societal development?"

dwringer Feb 23, 2017 View on HN

A harmless example of technology with potentially devastating potential, that it's hard to imagine is not being used to such ends as we speak.

philipwhiuk Oct 29, 2025 View on HN

Just because all those other inventions didn't wreck humanity doesn't mean this one won't.

mfoy_ Sep 1, 2017 View on HN

Any technology can be used in ways the inventor had not intended, and possibly would not wish.

anileated Jul 13, 2024 View on HN

Any tech can be harmful, cf. cryptocurrency or nuclear bombs. My comment mostly referred to taking it to such extreme with a particular tech. Some people also tend, while demonizing (the yet to be confirmed to be possible even in theory) AGI and its capabilities, to completely sideline humans deploying it, as if they would be guilt-free.

IanCal May 20, 2024 View on HN

"so advanced it's a threat to humankind" and "some people might use this in a bad way" are incredibly different.

infruset Nov 18, 2014 View on HN

It seems like you are unfairly singling out one particular advance in technology among many which could be equally responsible for killing or surveillance.Furthermore, since this also opens some very positive perspectives, why not try and work together towards them? Whatever well-intentioned people do, the ill-intentioned would still have researched this and devoted it maybe more exclusively towards evil purposes.