ISP Regulation Debate

The cluster centers on debates about ISPs' rights to block, throttle, or prioritize content, their status as common carriers, and comparisons to social media moderation amid net neutrality discussions. Key issues include monopolistic practices, FCC decisions like Pai's repeal, and whether ISPs should act as neutral utilities.

📉 Falling 0.3x Politics & Society
4,074
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#2750
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
5
2008
32
2009
47
2010
109
2011
121
2012
126
2013
143
2014
391
2015
198
2016
179
2017
801
2018
397
2019
219
2020
207
2021
305
2022
205
2023
262
2024
163
2025
156
2026
8

Keywords

e.g II ISP DNS US AT FCC YouTube E.g PAAS isp isps internet content providers carriers carrier common services prioritizing

Sample Comments

SteveNuts • Apr 22, 2021 • View on HN

Maybe ISPs would finally be forced to act as impartial common carriers

waterlesscloud • Feb 15, 2011 • View on HN

By this logic, the customer's ISP also deserves a cut.

Paul-ish • Jul 12, 2017 • View on HN

Whats to prevent ISPs from starving out the whole internet package to force people into buying additions?

Joakal • May 13, 2012 • View on HN

What rights are taken from ISPs?

nodata • Feb 23, 2014 • View on HN

With a monopolist ISP? How are they arguing that one?

salawat • Jan 12, 2021 • View on HN

That's the irony here. ISP's aren't common carriers anymore. Thanks Pai. /sSo it's all good your ISP can do whatever.

jackjeff • Mar 5, 2021 • View on HN

Why not require ISPs to do this instead?

true_religion • Oct 23, 2021 • View on HN

They could just be an ISP. They can take money, provide services, and be regulated like a utility.

ryanpcmcquen • May 10, 2018 • View on HN

Controlling ISPs !== controlling the internet.

driverdan • Jun 12, 2019 • View on HN

This isn't internet regulation, it's ISP regulation. There's a difference.