WordPress vs Static Generators

The cluster centers on debates comparing WordPress to static site generators like Hugo, Jekyll, and Gatsby for blogs and websites, discussing trade-offs in ease of use, security, performance, maintenance, and plugin ecosystems.

📉 Falling 0.3x Web Development
3,832
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#2740
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
4
2008
52
2009
46
2010
115
2011
128
2012
191
2013
252
2014
170
2015
198
2016
199
2017
225
2018
264
2019
246
2020
383
2021
298
2022
317
2023
260
2024
332
2025
143
2026
9

Keywords

SSG PHP WordPress IDE Wordpress.com UI squarespace.com HN TryGhost wordpress.org wordpress static site static cms site plugins generator ghost wp hugo

Sample Comments

cutemonster Jun 8, 2020 View on HN

Works for me too -- for me, Gatsby or Hugo etc are quicker and simpler than WPEspecially long term wrt security

paulpauper May 29, 2023 View on HN

Wordpress is a full-featured CMS. Most people would be better off with something like a static site generator

quickthrower2 Feb 20, 2023 View on HN

I almost always use Wordpress for Blogs and sites in general.Reasons:If I leave it for 10 years and come back I will know how to maintain it. The tools will exist (especially if WordPress auto upgrades).If I use some static site gen, I will need to remember all the syntax, use some docker container to run the version I used all that time ago. Even coming back to it after a year can leave me with confusion.Also WordPress has a brilliant ecosystem of plugins and themes. And if you are

jpatters Jul 3, 2016 View on HN

You are right, Wordpress is not just Wordpress. And the obvious thing that we are missing is the plugin ecosystem that Wordpress has.That being said, if you can do without plugins, I would highly recommend using a static site generator as it can reduce your development cost as well as your management cost. There is no backend to build and no server to manage. Forestry is a tool to allow you to take advantage of the benefits of a static site generator from a development and management perspect

T3RMINATED Aug 15, 2020 View on HN

use wordpress over ghost everytime

My site runs on WordPress and sitegrounds, it's very fast. But the learning curve is higher than netlify and jekyll due to having to learn WordPress.My site has too much garbage content I wrote on it at the moment (in hindsight I wrote whatever came to mind). Half my pages aren't even exactly done yet.I'm going to focus less on writing opinionated articles, more on useful articles and or tutorials on there or well thought out reflections related to lessons learned.Short t

keiferski Mar 30, 2023 View on HN

Just use WordPress. These other options like Jekyll or a headless CMS will be too complicated.

ozim Oct 9, 2024 View on HN

Wordpress has plugins to generate static sites. You can have your rich editing and fast loading times as well.

system2 Oct 14, 2021 View on HN

I am afraid to sound millennial but why not WordPress + Static Site Generator Plugin? I totally get it, this is a fun project to test some skills but if the concern was going live, I can go live with vanilla wordpress with their default theme in less than a minute.

simion314 Jan 23, 2022 View on HN

>tl;dr: Use a static site generator.Most People that use WordPress are not develoeprs or technical people. Find similar product with a WYSIWYG GUI , theme , plugins, cheap hosting, no bullshit licensing or breaking backwards compatibility and promote it to people or whoever hosts this blogs.I think you are suggesting someone to replace his IDE with notepad since you can build application with notepad and gcc directly.