Google AMP Criticism

Comments criticize AMP for not inherently improving page speeds, attributing its perceived speed to Google's preloading and caching in search results, and argue that optimized standard HTML pages can load just as fast without AMP's restrictions or Google's control.

📉 Falling 0.2x Web Development
2,226
Comments
13
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#2715
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2010
1
2013
1
2015
36
2016
225
2017
490
2018
453
2019
494
2020
273
2021
180
2022
46
2023
12
2024
2
2025
13

Keywords

e.g amp.dev IMHO JS SPDY V8 PageSpeed UI HTTP2 googleblog.com amp pages google fast content load site page web faster

Sample Comments

stephenr Apr 17, 2019 View on HN

Users like pages that load quickly, which amp is not a requirement for.Amp is designed to tighten googles grip on the web, nothing more.

TekMol Jun 15, 2018 View on HN

Amp adds nothing to make a site faster. The opposite. It adds some mandatory libraries. It just imposes some restrictions on what a page can contain. So the version companies make to be included in amp might be smaller then their original version for that reason.We should downrank slow bloated sites directly instead. Then companies would have an incentive to make their sites fast from the start.

corobo Jun 11, 2017 View on HN

You could just not enable AMP if your site loads faster without it

underwater Aug 11, 2019 View on HN

The only reason AMP is faster than most webpages is because Google preloads and prerenders the content when you are still on the Google results page. It's not a fair contest. We've seen our HTML pages be consistently faster than our AMP pages when all else is even.

lqqkout4elfy Jul 10, 2019 View on HN

This site loads amazingly fast! Proves the point that you really don't need AMP.

buboard Aug 11, 2019 View on HN

- in most cases loading the amphtml page of the website is faster and contains the same article- Wait a few months until amp pages become as heavy, and then heavier than their html counterparts.Amp is at best a hacky temporary patch, it doesnt solve the problem.

tick_tock_tick Dec 19, 2020 View on HN

https://developers.googleblog.com/2019/08/the-speed-benefit-... they are wrong

josho Aug 16, 2020 View on HN

My understanding is that amp forces pages to stop doing the things they’ve been doing for years that made their pages bloated and slow to load.It’s too bad the sites just couldn’t do that on their own and avoid the need for amp.

hannob Oct 17, 2016 View on HN

AMP is essentially Google's answer to people creating terrible web experiences. It's been discussed and documented a lot. Common webpages today load content from dozens of different ad, tracking and whatever hosts, take several megabytes to load. All well known, but people don't stop doing it.Now Google comes along and says: You can't do it, let us do it. Which is perfectly reasonable from their point of view. And when I surf google news on my slow mobile connection I'

lwansbrough May 11, 2019 View on HN

Technically speaking it does nothing of the sort. It helps websites be absorbed by Google so that Google can retain the user on their site. Which keeps the experience fast. But you don’t need Google to make your site fast, and in some cases using AMP can slow your site down. If it was just about making the web fast, there wouldn’t be AMP-only features. It would just be “fast only” and websites would have to meet certain criteria to pass that test. You should try using your brain a little more wh