Audiophile Blind Tests

Discussions debate the subjectivity of audio quality perception, with audiophiles claiming differences in high-end equipment that often fail blind tests, highlighting placebo effects and objective measurements.

πŸ“‰ Falling 0.3x Hardware
3,956
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#2342
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
2
2008
7
2009
47
2010
34
2011
61
2012
110
2013
104
2014
284
2015
259
2016
149
2017
224
2018
250
2019
272
2020
310
2021
424
2022
441
2023
473
2024
228
2025
244
2026
33

Keywords

e.g DAC IT LAME HN MP3 OP EXPERIMENT NwAvGuy DSP audio headphones sound blind music equipment quality test subjective listening

Sample Comments

zurn β€’ Mar 4, 2021 β€’ View on HN

It's subjective, like in high end audio.

zerr β€’ Mar 14, 2023 β€’ View on HN

A brain is subjective. I believe many audiophiles indeed perceive audio quality difference so those products do really make a difference for them.

JCattheATM β€’ Jan 3, 2026 β€’ View on HN

100% - most 'audiophile' wouldn't pass a blind test checking audio quality.

cesaref β€’ Jan 1, 2023 β€’ View on HN

As you say, not a blind test.It's very easy to convince yourself that something is helping. It's very common in audio production circles to have had the experience of working on, say, a snare track, tweaking EQ or whatever, and to convince yourself that you've improved it only to realise that the EQ is bypassed or you're on the wrong channel - basically you wiggle some knobs that make absolutely no difference to the sound but still hear a difference.I'm pleased you

Dylan16807 β€’ Apr 11, 2014 β€’ View on HN

It's hard to notice subtle things without an A/B test, it might just be that quiet parts of certain songs just don't sound as good.For something like this you would want to measure the noise levels, not make assumptions about audiophiles being wrong; they're only wrong a significant fraction of the time.

saagarjha β€’ Dec 26, 2019 β€’ View on HN

You’re an audiophile. Not everyone is.

adamio β€’ Jul 10, 2014 β€’ View on HN

Audiophiles basically agree that ears are sub-par

frabert β€’ Jun 5, 2024 β€’ View on HN

We're talking audiophiles, it's not like they're trying to cheap out.

dagw β€’ Mar 13, 2023 β€’ View on HN

Like wine, most audio tech and most "audiophiles" is entirely reasonable. Listening to your favourite album on a $10000 hifi setup is a much better experience than listening to it over Spotify on the cheap earbuds that came with your phone. Some speakers do obviously sound better that others, and how you place those speakers in your room objectively has an effect on how good they sound. People with good ears can absolutely hear the difference between cheap and expensive amps and DACs.

frou_dh β€’ Sep 8, 2013 β€’ View on HN

As someone who used to be in to audiophilia, debates on sound quality of equipment and the supposed night and day differences are an incredible exercise in futility and purchase justification. Smoke some cannabis and $5 earbuds fed by a no-name MP3 player will deliver more detail than the custom modded Sennheisers fed by an amp and DAC stack imported from a boutique in Belgium would have gotten you otherwise.