Cryptographic Signatures Debate

Commenters debate the sufficiency and use of cryptographic signatures for verifying authenticity, integrity, and preventing forgery in various contexts like messages, software, or statements.

📉 Falling 0.4x Security
4,695
Comments
19
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#2245
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2008
17
2009
27
2010
31
2011
48
2012
70
2013
134
2014
159
2015
180
2016
306
2017
239
2018
311
2019
337
2020
464
2021
496
2022
526
2023
512
2024
424
2025
383
2026
35

Keywords

e.g MAC GameFreak CRL HTTPS PGP CVE SHA1 ONE TCP signature signatures signed cryptographic message key cryptographically signing private key django

Sample Comments

oh_sigh • Mar 13, 2016 • View on HN

Why wouldn't cryptographic signatures be enough?

theamk • Jan 5, 2021 • View on HN

Which problem do you see? It's just a signature, they cannot be forged without a corresponding private key.

fastball • Jan 15, 2019 • View on HN

You can't fake cryptographic signatures.

tytytytytytytyt • Jun 23, 2018 • View on HN

Why can't someone just check the digital signature like he says?

StavrosK • Jul 12, 2014 • View on HN

If only there were some way to cryptographically sign stuff...

cm2187 • Jan 19, 2016 • View on HN

But can't this be achieved with a simple cryptographic signature?

mobiuscog • Jul 31, 2015 • View on HN

Isn't that the point of the signature verification ?

eps • Dec 13, 2012 • View on HN

Checking signatures obviously won't help here.

Coulnd't all sides be satisfied if only signature verification code was added, but not signing?

therein • Jun 30, 2018 • View on HN

Any proof? Like you'd think he'd cryptographically sign this message at least.