Insider Trading Debate
Discussions center on whether specific actions involving non-public information constitute illegal insider trading, with references to legal definitions, examples from politicians and executives, and debates on exemptions or enforcement.
Activity Over Time
Top Contributors
Keywords
Sample Comments
Acting on non-public information constitutes insider trading - wonder if this qualifies.
It is very much insider trading: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insider_trading
Insider trading is against the law. Her trades, if conducted by anyone without power, would be investigated for insider trading.
A.I. doesn't have insider trading expertise.
How is this not insider trading?
Because you'd get charged with insider trading if you do.
Probably insider trading? They exempted themselves from insider trading laws specifically for this purpose.
Yes, but that isn't insider trading. Maybe it violates some other rule; IANAL.
Your ignorance is comical. Thanks for trying.Illegal insider trading refers generally to buying or selling a security, in breach of a fiduciary duty or other relationship of trust and confidence, while in possession of material, nonpublic information about the security. Insider trading violations may also include "tipping" such information, securities trading by the person "tipped," and securities trading by those who misappropriate such information.From: <a href="http:
Is this not insider trading? He made decisions based on info not available to general public.