Single Points of Failure

The cluster focuses on debates about single points of failure (SPOF) in systems, questioning if multiple SPOFs are better or worse than one, and emphasizing redundancy and failure modes to improve reliability.

📉 Falling 0.5x DevOps & Infrastructure
3,668
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#2078
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
2
2008
12
2009
28
2010
50
2011
60
2012
90
2013
131
2014
114
2015
119
2016
186
2017
191
2018
214
2019
328
2020
280
2021
405
2022
379
2023
363
2024
359
2025
347
2026
10

Keywords

LHC ycombinator.com JUST ENOUGH QA NASA failure point failure single point single point failure fail single points redundancy failures redundant

Sample Comments

RangerScience • Feb 14, 2018 • View on HN

All systems have failure modes; so, use multiple systems to do things that are important.

burtonator • Jan 8, 2022 • View on HN

Are these 'points of failure' ? not single points of failure? I assume some of these have redundancy but could fail.

bagels • Feb 16, 2023 • View on HN

Yes, but is multiple single points of failure better than one?

brador • Apr 27, 2013 • View on HN

Wouldn't that mean a single point of failure?

rhizome • Feb 6, 2014 • View on HN

There's always a single point of failure.

anarcat • Jun 5, 2015 • View on HN

beats the current system, where there is multiple single points of failures. :p

kitkat_new • Oct 4, 2021 • View on HN

to also face a failure in the single point of failure - system?

jjn2009 • Apr 27, 2016 • View on HN

Nope that sounds like the ramifications of having a single point of failure.

sgc • Sep 15, 2022 • View on HN

I am not familiar with this. What makes them less of a single point of failure?

kristopolous • Jan 17, 2017 • View on HN

A single point of failure is an advantage?