Real Names Policy Debate

The cluster centers on debates about requiring real names on social platforms like Google+ and Facebook, weighing privacy risks, anonymity needs, accountability, and effects on user behavior and content.

📉 Falling 0.4x Politics & Society
4,194
Comments
19
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#1973
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2008
20
2009
47
2010
143
2011
573
2012
310
2013
465
2014
251
2015
310
2016
126
2017
222
2018
252
2019
189
2020
242
2021
287
2022
262
2023
194
2024
136
2025
157
2026
8

Keywords

SEO FB UX HN youtu.be PayPal USENET SC2 SE NEVER use real real names using real facebook anonymity identity online google post

Sample Comments

antihero Nov 27, 2013 View on HN

Did they sort out the "forcing you to use real names" thing yet? A lot of people have very good reasons for not wanting to expose their real identity to every community Google eats up.

zmmmmm Aug 5, 2011 View on HN

When I think through all the different conversations I've had online that I almost certainly would have chosen not to have were they directly traceable to my real name it becomes brain dead obvious to me that a "Real Name" policy is going to strangle the life out of G+ as a medium for interesting conversations. Sure I'll be on there ... but what you will see will be strictly my professional persona - the lowest common denominator of what I can afford to expose publicly across all aspects of my

jrockway Jul 25, 2011 View on HN

I think there are two reasons for making people use their real names, and it's not this. One is preventing non-person entities from using the service. Nobody wants a "friend" that's "Mashable News" or "Coca Cola". When these accounts start following you, it's worse than spam. If you want to advertise, buy an ad so I can block it.Secondly is the "anonymous people are jackasses" problem that's pervasive everywhere on the Internet. If people have to use their real names, they will behave on

chronic25 Aug 22, 2013 View on HN

Not everyone wants this identity. Especially with your real name.

glandium Sep 24, 2016 View on HN

If you're trying to maintain anonymity, why is your username your real name?

wnevets Oct 30, 2013 View on HN

Im assuming to the goal is to keep people using their real names?

Shish2k Nov 14, 2013 View on HN

"The promise [...] was that making people use their real names would incentivize them to behave themselves. It's abundantly clear now that there are more than enough people who are willing to be jerks under their real names. In the meantime, people who have good reason not to post under their own names -- vulnerable people, whistleblowers, others -- are now fully on display to those sociopaths who are only too happy to press the attack with or without anonymity."Told you so :(<

detaro Oct 6, 2015 View on HN

How is not using a real name "giving up social networking entirely"?

overcast Aug 25, 2016 View on HN

What's the issue with using your "real name"? Honestly I think that should be the policy more places, so people aren't hiding behind their online personas.

awqrre May 3, 2017 View on HN

Why don't you require real names while you're at it?