Patent Troll Debate

Comments primarily debate whether a specific company or entity qualifies as a patent troll, discussing definitions, examples, strategies against trolls, and defenses against the label.

📉 Falling 0.3x Legal
2,579
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#192
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
3
2008
20
2009
34
2010
130
2011
282
2012
278
2013
343
2014
208
2015
138
2016
142
2017
113
2018
139
2019
127
2020
83
2021
124
2022
104
2023
138
2024
109
2025
63
2026
1

Keywords

HN zendesk.com wikimedia.org ycombinator.com TV RICO MAN patent patent troll troll patent trolls trolls patents trolling nokia common sense inventor

Sample Comments

mort96 • Dec 19, 2023 • View on HN

They seem close enough to a patent troll to me.

zoobab • Oct 7, 2025 • View on HN

They are a patent troll for a long time.

Maybe the patent trolls got played?

Zirro • Jan 14, 2012 • View on HN

They are not patent trolls. See: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Patent_troll

mouse_ • Jan 19, 2025 • View on HN

Doesn't the existence of patent trolls invalidate this?

larrydavid • Dec 10, 2012 • View on HN

'Patent troll' doesn't mean what you think it means.

ibic • Oct 13, 2017 • View on HN

Risking heated debates, but I'm still going to say: isn't this patent troll at its finest?

DanBC • Aug 5, 2014 • View on HN

You're not helping him; you're sticking it to a patent troll.

new_test • Jan 8, 2014 • View on HN

This isn't any different than being a patent troll.

fredBuddemeyer • Oct 7, 2011 • View on HN

hmmm how bout we patent the act of patent trolling and then sue the trolls for infringement.