Bank Deposit Safety

The cluster debates the safety and risks of keeping money in traditional banks versus alternatives like fintech or crypto services, focusing on FDIC insurance, fractional reserve banking, bank runs, and government protections.

📉 Falling 0.1x Finance & Crypto
3,217
Comments
19
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#1834
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2008
21
2009
34
2010
26
2011
49
2012
38
2013
137
2014
89
2015
104
2016
111
2017
134
2018
143
2019
170
2020
129
2021
303
2022
337
2023
1,174
2024
108
2025
98
2026
12

Keywords

LOT US en.m SafeBank FDIC E.g SIB wikipedia.org bank banks money fdic money bank deposits risk cash safe assets

Sample Comments

WJW Jul 4, 2022 View on HN

If you want that kind of security, normal banks are a better place for your money. Traditional finance may have its drawbacks but at least customers losing their deposits because the bank went bankrupt is extremely rare these days.

foobarbazetc Jan 2, 2018 View on HN

No rich person is keeping money unprotected like that. Most banks offer FDIC maximization solutions.

matheusmoreira Mar 12, 2023 View on HN

Simply because "depositing" money at a bank is not supposed to be a safe operation. You're lending money to the bank. There is risk involved. If the government made it look like there's no risk, then someone is paying to offset that risk. I don't want to be the one paying for it.

tannhauser23 Mar 10, 2023 View on HN

Keeping your money in a bank is acting in a risky manner?

dlubarov Mar 13, 2023 View on HN

Why should there be risks? If someone just wants to park some cash without it possibly disappearing, that seems like a solvable problem. E.g. as the parent said, central banks could simply offer accounts to anybody.

forum_ghost Jun 11, 2022 View on HN

None of your bank balances are 100% backed.

xxpor Feb 21, 2014 View on HN

You do realize your money has been in a 'big bank' this whole time, right?

wyager Sep 1, 2021 View on HN

Banks don’t “guard your money” at all. They use it to make loans. Leaving money at a bank exposes you to vastly more systemic risk than just putting bills in a safe or something. If they’re not remunerating you for it, you’re getting screwed.

mikeash Mar 4, 2014 View on HN

I can only guess that people have become so used to solid financial institutions that present little risk for deposited money. Even non-FDIC institutions, like stock brokerages, usually have extremely low risk for deposited cash. If you're thinking like that, why not let them hold onto it? It's less effort. Of course, we see the answer to "why not?" here.

unity1001 Mar 13, 2023 View on HN

> Having your bank account randomly disappear isn't one of the risks that anyone should have to take.Then you put your funds in less risky banks who did not lobby to get an exemption from the regulations that protect against precisely this kind of thing. Even, spread it around safer banks.Putting all of one's money in a bank because they have better returns or other investment opportunities is business. Not something that someone can be safe at the public's expense.The