COVID-19 Lab Leak Debate

This cluster centers on debates about the origins of SARS-CoV-2, contrasting natural zoonotic spillover from bats via the Wuhan wet market against an accidental leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology studying bat coronaviruses.

📉 Falling 0.1x Health
4,001
Comments
13
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#1805
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2013
1
2014
3
2015
2
2016
2
2017
1
2018
1
2019
2
2020
921
2021
1,510
2022
791
2023
451
2024
129
2025
187

Keywords

e.g US UNC sciencemag.org youtube.com CCP COV2 RNA nature.com snopes.com lab wuhan virus sars bat viruses outbreak sars cov wet labs

Sample Comments

FabHK Mar 6, 2022 View on HN

Yes. Some more quotes might clarify:> These papers fill in some interesting details about the early outbreak at the market in Wuhan where the epidemic was first identified, but they don’t identify an intermediate host species that caught the virus from bats and then spread it to humans. Nor do they identify a precursor virus in a population of wild bats that lives near Wuhan or near farms supplying the Wuhan market. They show that the virus was introduced to the market at some point, but t

reducesuffering Feb 13, 2021 View on HN

Are you serious?Occam's Razor says the only (non-vet) BSL4 lab in China, studying bat coronaviruses, several miles from known first virus reports, that has had multiple previous virus leaks, with huge information shutdown by China for a year, is the more plausible culprit.

tripletao Apr 10, 2021 View on HN

This depends how you define "like this one"; but Zhengli Shi personally discovered the origin of SARS in bats, and her group is probably the world's top researcher of such viruses. The only lab I'm aware of that's remotely competitive is Ralph Baric's. If anyone knows of others with programs of similar scale, please post citations.Of course far more virology labs exist in the world. But since this pandemic is SARS-like, the correct comparison is only labs working

cameldrv Feb 18, 2020 View on HN

I can't speak to this article, because I don't have the technical knowledge to evaluate it.I think that if you don't accept that it's a reasonable possibility that this escaped from one of the labs in Wuhan, you're being unscientific. The evidence for it having come from the lab is:1. The Wuhan Institute of Virology published papers in the past two years about their experimentation with chimeric coronaviruses. Viruses similar to this one were without question pre

mirimir Jul 12, 2020 View on HN

I've seen an article claiming that it spread from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. But not in the sense that they created, improved or selected it. I gather that they were simply isolating and studying viruses from bats that had been collected in southern China. And they were doing that based on concerns about new pandemics, given experience with SARS and MERS, and the expectation that there would be more zoonotic jumps from bat populations.

hayst4ck Feb 14, 2021 View on HN

I don't think you're being very good faith right now.Clearly a lab studying coronaviruses is interesting. Clearly its possible that the lab could have had a leak. Clearly it's possible a farmer could have wandered into a cave, or run into a bat in the wild. Clearly it's possible that it didn't originate in China.There is certainly enough evidence to investigate the lab being a possibility. It definitively being responsible or not is definitely of interest. There wa

ab7675226 Apr 9, 2021 View on HN

Occam's Razor indeed. The lab in Wuhan was studying bats and coronaviruses. Animal transmission is completely consistent with a lab leak, especially given that the virus in question is transmissible before symptoms.The wet market in Wuhan was not selling bats.

gregwebs Dec 10, 2020 View on HN

The US frequently has it's own lab incidents including even with anthrax. China must be having lab incidents as well. There isn't a smoking gun to indicate either that this is a lab outbreak or natural. However, in the absence of evidence we need to ask ourselves which is more likely:1) A disease traveled hundreds of miles to a large city without leaving a trace of evidence2) A lab had yet another outbreakAlmost all of the outbreak attention has been focused on the Wuhan lab t

eindiran Jun 13, 2020 View on HN

That's correct: researchers have found a lot of similar coronaviruses in southern China.> “I wondered if [the municipal health authority] got it wrong,” she says. “I had never expected this kind of thing to happen in Wuhan, in central China.” Her studies had shown that the southern, subtropical provinces of Guangdong, Guangxi and Yunnan have the greatest risk of coronaviruses jumping to humans from animals—particularly bats, a known reservoir. If coronaviruses were the culprit, she re

EdwardDiego Nov 24, 2021 View on HN

I lean towards the accidental lab escape theory, given the work the Wuhan lab was known to be doing, while only being a level 3 lab, and that the first cases originated in a nearby market, it feels like it satisfies Occams shaving implement.As for why there were no previous wild outbreaks, that I can't answer,except that the people who found the origins of SARS in horseshoe bats in Yunnan didn't find the virus itself, but rather it's genetics spread across diverse strains of co