Climate Science Consensus
Discussions center on defending the scientific consensus on climate change, particularly the accuracy of IPCC reports and predictions, against skeptic claims with links to NASA, Scientific American, and IPCC sources.
Activity Over Time
Top Contributors
Keywords
Sample Comments
No, this has been pretty well documented and reported.https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-science-p...
Hi conspiracy theorist!Full of references including that number:https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4S9sDyooxf4TL;DW (poorly): Even IPCC scientists are sort of refusing to believe pessimistic data.
I know a lot of people say that, but have you heard it from real scientists?Here is a "debunking" I like, from someone who actually read the IPCC report:https://reason.com/2019/08/01/despite-what-democrats-said-at...
IPCC report predictions have been correct, do they count as demonstration?
Spend a few days reading the scientific reports at ipcc.ch and see if you are still skeptic.
Please read the latest IPCC report it's all in there.
It's actually not wrong.https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
Are we still talking about this? Perhaps it's time to hear what IPCC Experts say :https://youtu.be/1BDmIis9STE
As waterlesscloud notes, I'm talking about the popular use. I'll turn around your IPCC argument: anyone with a clue would realize there was a distinct chance another change in the party line like the cooling to warming flip would be required by the short term temperature record, so the IPCC merely future proofed their gravy train.My calling was science. Finances prevented me from fulfilling that potential, which is why you'll find me here in Hacker News.Saying "