Online Mobs

The cluster discusses the dangers of angry internet mobs on social media platforms like Twitter, which pile on individuals for opinions or remarks, leading to firings, doxxing, death threats, and other real-world consequences.

📉 Falling 0.3x Politics & Society
3,214
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#1561
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
1
2008
8
2009
21
2010
43
2011
65
2012
80
2013
193
2014
105
2015
189
2016
138
2017
175
2018
220
2019
249
2020
339
2021
553
2022
334
2023
215
2024
129
2025
138
2026
19

Keywords

AI quillette.com YC HN OK RMS E.g CEO mob twitter internet fired media social media angry shame social somebody

Sample Comments

bobby_9x Feb 12, 2016 View on HN

People have gotten fired and had mobs of hashtag warriors try to destroy their personal lives for merely stating facts or a personal opinion.Yet, the same mobs of people somehow think they are allowed to say the worst things, with no consequences.I'm glad Woods is going after people like this. If anything, it might put a stop to some of the nonsense.

skrebbel Oct 24, 2020 View on HN

Yeah, vigilante justice by an angry internet mob, what could possibly go wrong?

rdtsc Oct 1, 2013 View on HN

Quite possible. Other people (non-famous) have had this happen after snide, critical or funny remarks on twitter and facebook.

Peos Jul 6, 2021 View on HN

the problem is that the majority of the internet users are clueless in general and they act as a mob. one ill-minded person spewed utter lies against a project name and then the mob jumped along him to lynch the author and the maintainer. those people don't have the decency to apologize or even try to restore what they destroyed. They only become louder and louder and ofc, try to make some money on top of it.

gwright Apr 15, 2022 View on HN

People have lost their jobs, gotten death threats, had personal information shared, been swatted, and so on when the mob didn't like what you said on Twitter (or Facebook or ...).

curtisblaine Aug 20, 2018 View on HN

This might be of interest: https://quillette.com/2018/08/13/nobody-should-listen-to-twi...

rjf72 Sep 17, 2019 View on HN

If somebody doesn't want to associate with somebody I think that's of course 100% fine, even if in response to nothing more than what somebody said. But if somebody chooses not to associate with somebody because of an online mob [1] - that's not so okay. Granted some line does have to be drawn here. I think it's great that social media was able to 'touch' an 'untouchable' like Weinstein that would have been impossible without the protection of a mob. But n

bduerst May 21, 2019 View on HN

Please don't. What you're referring to doing is a snowball that routinely can (and does) roll out of control. The internet would be a marginally better place if it didn't turn into mob retaliation at every outrage incident.

js8 Aug 23, 2017 View on HN

I don't think any protections are needed. People just need to stop participating in those "online mobs" and not take them seriously.It's the same tactic that needs to be employed against terrorists. The more seriously you take them, the bigger threat they are.The people who fired Damore are the problem. They escalated the conflict. They are the ones who should have known better and not get involved in mob justice.

gnicholas Jun 23, 2023 View on HN

Yes, may have been ironic; but did the first guy who was wronged have a big following on social media?