Corporate Euphemisms for Employees

The cluster discusses annoyance with corporate jargon and euphemisms like 'resources', 'talent', 'individual contributor', and 'staffer' used instead of straightforward terms like 'employee' or 'worker', often highlighting dehumanizing aspects of such language.

📉 Falling 0.3x Career & Jobs
2,650
Comments
20
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#1502
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2007
6
2008
15
2009
24
2010
66
2011
53
2012
65
2013
104
2014
117
2015
104
2016
132
2017
151
2018
172
2019
172
2020
193
2021
209
2022
387
2023
330
2024
147
2025
187
2026
16

Keywords

e.g VP US DB XYZ MBBD HN IT BS EMS employee employees ambulance resources term manager workers corporate employed really really

Sample Comments

mulmen • Jun 14, 2023 • View on HN

Here’s an idea, call them employees.

maxxxxx • Aug 1, 2018 • View on HN

In my company they have started to call people "resources" :)

mambo_giro • Sep 25, 2025 • View on HN

It’s their term for corporate employees.

rvz • May 18, 2020 • View on HN

That sounds like a very qute name for 'employees'.

windows_tips • Jul 10, 2018 • View on HN

I meant employee in a general sense. Maybe "worker" is better?

zelly • Jun 15, 2020 • View on HN

I suggest the terms "boss" and "employee".

hidelooktropic • Dec 26, 2023 • View on HN

Not trying to be mean here but do you mean "Employee"?

rounce • Nov 13, 2019 • View on HN

Why 'staffer' instead of 'employee'?

McAlpine5892 • Sep 25, 2025 • View on HN

This pains me so. Every time I have to hear "individual contributor", "leadership", or "the brand" I die a little inside.Please just call me an employee or engineer. As for "leadership", I am somewhat convinced that the word "management" would lead to a mid-life crisis. Such inflated egos. As for "the brand", they are my employer.This Newspeak has benefits though. Mainly that it hides in plain sight the top-down hierarchy of power

tptacek • Feb 10, 2022 • View on HN

It's not an overloaded term. It means "employee".