Driverless Trains

Discussions center on the existence, examples, challenges, and technologies like CBTC and Positive Train Control for implementing automated or driverless train systems in subways, urban rail, and main lines, including comparisons to manual operations and safety concerns.

📉 Falling 0.5x DevOps & Infrastructure
3,542
Comments
19
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#1214
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2008
1
2009
8
2010
26
2011
29
2012
48
2013
79
2014
106
2015
168
2016
221
2017
301
2018
382
2019
267
2020
206
2021
226
2022
476
2023
330
2024
305
2025
335
2026
28

Keywords

NY MS US MUST e.g youtube.com ICE PTC AI BIOS trains train rail automated tracks track subway distance station control

Sample Comments

drorco Jul 28, 2022 View on HN

There are self-driving trains:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_automated_train_system...

josephcsible Dec 27, 2022 View on HN

Because trains don't need scheduling software or crews?

bdonlan Sep 2, 2015 View on HN

The problem with some of these old lines is that they might have level crossings in which pedestrians or cars might occupy the tracks - so someone needs to be there to stop the train if that happens. Fully automated systems like the SkyTrain or Japan's Yurikamome line have grade-separated tracks (and in some cases platform gates as well) to ensure that sort of incursion doesn't happen.

known Apr 26, 2016 View on HN

Why are we not seeing driver-less trains?

iaabtpbtpnn Dec 21, 2017 View on HN

The solution you're asking for exists and is called Positive Train Control. They didn't have it.

koheripbal Nov 27, 2021 View on HN

An automated rail system might work better.

leoc Dec 4, 2019 View on HN

While there are similarities I don't think they go that far. In particular, driverless train operation is only made possible by the fact that network operators and governments are fanatical about fighting obstructions and unauthorised crossings on railway track—to say nothing of unauthorised users!—regardless of whether the trains are automated or not. (In fact railways seem (I am not an expert) to be very vulnerable to disruption if these efforts fail, viz. the notoriety of train delays in

martinald Feb 6, 2023 View on HN

This video shows signals everywhere: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPE1yDddAiwYou can even see a train on the opposing line stopped at a signal before the platform.You literally would have accidents daily if you had NO signals at all on such an intensive line. You cannot run more than one train on a line with no signals and not have accidents given the stopping distances of trains, you can't do i

lpribis Nov 13, 2024 View on HN

Not true for a lot of (widely used) systems. Both the NY subway and London Underground are manually driven for the majority of lines.

rockarage Dec 22, 2017 View on HN

Maybe you should try reading the article?from the article:"Many stations like this one are not prepared to accommodate a larger volume of passengers, even if a new traffic control system allowed trains to come more frequently.""Much of the subway’s signal system uses antiquated parts like the electromechanical relays shown above from the West Fourth Street-Washington Square station in Manhattan.Train traffic for about two-thirds of the subway system is monitored in roo