AI Creativity Debate
This cluster centers on debates about whether AI and LLMs can achieve true creativity or merely remix and regurgitate human-generated data, contrasting it with human originality and intention.
Activity Over Time
Top Contributors
Keywords
Sample Comments
Only you, a human developer can be truly creative. An LLM can only ever reproduce what it has seen before.
You're assuming machines can't be creative.
AI will not be able to generate everything for us. Just the things that are able to be explored by humans and hopefully a tad bit more. AI is already more creative than humans by a lot of measures.
Two thoughts, AI will enable more people to express their creativity. And wait for large self trained models appear. I mean, how different is that from learning Go? It is a matter of time and AI can generate original work.
Absolutely! You can communicate with without (or with minimal) creativity. It’s not required in most cases. So AI is definitely very useful, and it can ape creativity better and better, but it will always be “faking it”.
Humans do things for humans, an AI, no matter how powerful, is not a human mind. So a human may be required to make is more creative in a way that isn't alien.
To quote GPT-4, "AI's 'creativity' is more about remixing and reinterpreting the information it has been fed".I think the degree to which a person perceives human-like creativity from AI/LLMs is inversely proportional to their understanding of how they work. Here's a great video that can help demystify GPTs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjZofJX0v4M
If your artwork can be generated by an AI, are you really creative?
It's a tool. The cleverness and artistry comes from the humans, not from the tools they use.The AI isn't creating the fresh ideas. People are.
What I mean is that the OP's prompt to the LLM is creative, not the LLM's output. The LLM's output just expounds on the human's prompt so the poem it generated is clearly not an example of creativity.