Fertility Incentives Debate

Discussions center on whether governments should provide financial incentives to encourage higher birth rates, viewing children as a public good with costs borne by parents amid declining fertility in industrialized nations.

➡️ Stable 0.6x Politics & Society
2,782
Comments
19
Years Active
5
Top Authors
#1052
Topic ID

Activity Over Time

2008
6
2009
18
2010
33
2011
27
2012
35
2013
95
2014
65
2015
121
2016
176
2017
115
2018
175
2019
195
2020
240
2021
270
2022
226
2023
348
2024
285
2025
343
2026
9

Keywords

e.g US EUR wikipedia.org nhentai.net USD AFAICT GDP BI PTO children parents child having children kids countries incentivize society payments incentives

Sample Comments

TulliusCicero Jul 8, 2013 View on HN

You have it backwards. Most industrialized countries are below the replacement rate even with current monetary incentives (e.g. tax breaks) to have children. Kids are an enormous financial burden to parents, and financially they benefit the wider society, not the parents. Assuming you don't want social security (or its equivalents) collapsing, you want to incentivize having children at least to the replacement rate.

BobaFloutist Jun 11, 2025 View on HN

If people having children is a public good, maybe it shouldn't be disincentivized?

lars512 Feb 24, 2015 View on HN

Without a welfare state, sounds like good incentive to have lots of kids!

ido Mar 31, 2017 View on HN

Why incentivize people to have children when there is no shortage of them?

hnauz Dec 22, 2018 View on HN

It would be better if they gave incentives to their own for having children.

Thorrez Jun 25, 2021 View on HN

I guess one option is to reward everyone for having children. Although this only makes sense if you want more children in your country. Some countries do. Singapore apparently has a giant "baby bonus" of incentives worth $121,400 USD to have 2 children.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_bonus

mooreds Jul 6, 2018 View on HN

To be blunt, this is a tragedy of the commons scenario. The costs are primarily on the parents, and then society gets the benefits (in the short term, of the spending by the parents, in the long term by the productivity and spending of the grown child). This is why smart policy makes it easier to have children--because overall some level of population growth causes economic growth which makes everyone's lives better.However, I don't know of any country in the world that has cracked

twobitshifter Oct 16, 2023 View on HN

I don’t have kids. It’s valuable for the greater good of society not just a child. You have to live with the eventual adults that develop under a system that supports caregivers or one that does not. If we don’t look beyond the first effect we can miss that.To further the point, the decision whether to have a kid can be influenced by how that affects someone’s own finances. These programs put a finger on the scale to encourage having children, something that financially to the individual does

billfruit Apr 17, 2019 View on HN

May be that is why they are starting to incentivize families to have more than one child.

al_borland Feb 11, 2024 View on HN

This will just lead to more people having kids for the paycheck they provide. Parents who view their kids as a source of income, instead of as a life they are responsible for nurturing, are generally not great parents. A bunch of bad parents with bad motivations leads to a generation of dysfunctional people.